Nov 4, 2024
Current Year Results
Results Search
Biggest/Best Boston Qualifier
2024 Results
2023 Results
2022 Results
2021 Results
2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
2016 Results
2015 Results
2014 Results
2013 Results
2012 Results
2011 Results
2010 Results
2009 Results
2008 Results
2007 Results
2006 Results
2005 Results
2004 Results
2003 Results
2002 Results
2001 Results
2000 Results
☰
City of Oaks Marathon Runner Comments
Back to City of Oaks Marathon Information & Reviews
Course 4.1 
Organization 4.3 
Spectators 3.7
Number of comments: 85 [displaying comments 71 to 81]
|
C. D. from Raleigh
(11/7/2007)
"Great Run!" (about: 2007)
3 previous marathons
| 1 City of Oaks Marathon
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 5 Great event and I'm confident it will only get better! Thanks to the RRO, the volunteers and the enthusiastic spectators - especially the drill sergeant who was downtown... he was the bomb! I'm already looking forward to next year! | |
|
K. V. from Cary, NC
(11/6/2007)
"So glad it's back!" (about: 2007)
4-5 previous marathons
| 1 City of Oaks Marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 I was very happy just to have a marathon in my home town so I would take just about anything. I thought the course was well laid out and had nice variety. Yes it's a hilly second half but hey, no marathon is easy. Volunteers and police support were great. Spectators were lean in some areas but those who were out were enthusiastic. Most importantly I think it's great to have a Raleigh marathon at all. Thanks to all the people who I'm sure put in countless hours to make this race happen. I hope it continues for years to come. | |
|
C. P. from Midwest, USA
(11/6/2007)
"Fun and challenging half marathon" (about: 2007)
First Marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 We ran the half marathon. A challenging course with the rolling hills, but Raleigh is beautiful. Early Nov. is the PERFECT time for this race. I was very impressed with the organization and volunteers - didn't feel like a "first time" event. Parking was logistically tough, but the start at the fairgrounds was a great idea. We'll definitely be back. Oh, a volunteer slapped my wife on the butt at mile 11, which was a little awkward and inappropriate, but I guess he was just excited to be helping. | |
|
C. K. from Raleigh, NC
(11/6/2007)
"Another Great NC Race" (about: 2007)
4-5 previous marathons
| 1 City of Oaks Marathon
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 This was an overall great experience. The organization was flawless, the course was scenic and challenging and the support was enthusiastic. It's already on my calendar for next year. | |
|
Jeff Milleman from Fort Wayne, Indiana
(11/5/2007)
"Friendly folks but tough marathon!" (about: 2007)
11-50 previous marathons
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 My wife and I have run around 40 marathons and would rate this one as a difficult course and definitely NOT a PR event. However, the marathon is worth the effort because the hotel (Comfort Suites), convenient start/finish area, and enthusiastic crowds made it really fun and satisfying. I normally don't comment on these sites but wanted to give the Raleigh RoadRunners a BIG THUMBS UP!! | |
|
A. S. from Chicago, IL
(11/5/2007)
"Hill as Heck - don't forget about the marathoners" (about: 2007)
11-50 previous marathons
| 1 City of Oaks Marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 4 At this point I have come to expect certain things for race directors: good pre-race organization, a good pasta dinner, easy to get registration bags, a nice course layout, liquids and gels on the course, and good post race food. If anyone one of the above is missing, well the race director failed at their venture. Starting off I have to say the RDs did a great job at most things: organization was really good, race support was excellent, and the course was good. Watch out for all you flatlanders like me, when they say flat they actually mean a slight up hill and when they say hilly you are running straight up and straight down. I don't think they understand flat in Raleigh (not a knock at all just a stmt of fact). A good challenging course none the less. The issue I have is the RDs need to make enough money so they open the races up to 1/2 marathons and then forget about the marathoners at the post race. This really makes me angry!!! I was out there busting my hump for just about 4 hours and to come back and have no food except some stail bread and a green banana!!! O'yea there was pizza that was being eaten by everyone except people that ran the race. It is simple, if you have not run the race don't allow people to eat the food It is there for the runners not the general public! It turned an otherwise great day into me not recommending this race yet. I have to thank the bag check girls since when I went and got my bag they gave me muffins and bagels to help me replenish. Also, where was the sports drink after the race? Ultima tastes horrible but sports drink is still needed after the run. My best guess is that there was plenty of food when the 1/2 marathons finished but, as usual, the RDs did not plan accordingly for the slower marathons (although I never thought 4 hours was slow). With that being said, I would skip next year '08 and wait for '09 to see if they have made improvements to the post race coordination. | |
|
J. B. from Raleigh, NC
(11/5/2007)
"Great marathon" (about: 2007)
4-5 previous marathons
| 1 City of Oaks Marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 I thought that the organizers did a great job with this event. The race started on time and the weather was beautiful. I knew that this was going to be a difficult race because I trained on most of it at some point. Running it in its entirety was really nice and really challenging. I thought the spectators were fantastic. This is not Boston or New York so you can't really expect to have the course lined with fans. I was pleasantly surprised at how many people did come out to show their support. The finish line was well organized. There was water, fruit, pizza, and local beer. That beer was good!! Since I knew what the course would be like, I trained well for it and did manage to get a PR. For anyone running this next year, I highly recommend weight training and practicing for the hills (definitely tougher than Boston). | |
|
D. J. from Durham, NC, USA
(11/5/2007)
"Nothing special, but not a disaster" (about: 2007)
4-5 previous marathons
| 1 City of Oaks Marathon
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 3 The course has some very nice aspects, including a beautiful stretch through Umstead Park. The last five miles are dull and dreadful, and they get progressively worse as you approach the end. After mile 24 you are literally running around the parking lot of the RBC Center. Organization was pretty good, although a 7:00 gun time is absurdly early, made all the worse by the fact that the first 4 miles headed due east into a blinding sun. Spectators were few but supportive. It's a race worth running, but don't put it high on your list. | |
|
J. D. from Fayetteville, NC
(11/5/2007)
"Good race" (about: 2007)
11-50 previous marathons
| 1 City of Oaks Marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 5 Good things... The course was challenging. Spectators were great. Volunteers were fantastic. Water stops spaced frequently. Not so good things... No gel at first gel stop. Only caffeinated gel at 2nd gel stop (not great for people with GI distress). Ran out of t-shirts. Ran out of pizza. Wrote to organizers a few times before race and never received any response. | |
|
B. P. from Holly Springs, NC
(11/4/2007)
"Terrific Weather; Great Course" (about: 2007)
1 previous marathon
| 1 City of Oaks Marathon
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 I will be back next year.... I ran the half and really enjoyed the course. The support and weather were fantastic - we started out at about 40 degrees. Crowd support was pretty good, especially for first-year race. |
Quick Links
Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools
© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC
