Jul 5, 2024
Current Year Results
Results Search
Biggest/Best Boston Qualifier
2024 Results
2023 Results
2022 Results
2021 Results
2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
2016 Results
2015 Results
2014 Results
2013 Results
2012 Results
2011 Results
2010 Results
2009 Results
2008 Results
2007 Results
2006 Results
2005 Results
2004 Results
2003 Results
2002 Results
2001 Results
2000 Results
☰
Chicago Marathon Runner Comments
Back to Chicago Marathon Information & Reviews
Course 4.7 
Organization 4.3 
Spectators 4.9
Number of comments: 949 [displaying comments 851 to 861]
|
A Runner from Minneapolis, MN
(10/15/2002)
 "fun race, fun town, gorgeous scenery,organized" (General Comments)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 For an out-of-towner, it was a breeze. Shuttled to/from the airport; subway to/from one great restaurant; walked to Navy Pier to another great restaurant; cab to a Blackhawks game. There is no shortage of fun things to do before and after the race. The race is flat and beautiful along the lakeshore. Going through China town, Greek town and whatever the other ethnic areas are reminded me of Epcot in Disneyworld! At some points the crowds were downright deafening. There were at least 4 live bands. As for the organization, I don't think they could have done a better job considering they had to accommodate 37,000 runners and all their friends and family at the finish. I will admit it was very crowded meeting up with people afterward, but they had all of Buckingham fountain organized by letter to help with the meeting-up process. Signs were plentiful, large, and high enough to easily see. I would run it again in a heartbeat. p.s. I ran my PB of 4:15:50!!! | |
|
A Runner from Boulder CO
(10/15/2002)
"Is Chicago really the fastest for you?" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 The organization, course and crowds are first rate. It is a wonderful experience. I'll limit my comments to the perception that Chicago is the place to go for a PR or a Boston qualifier. It is flat, just a few small inclines. The crowds also provide lots of encouragement. But, plan to lose quite a bit of time due to congestion. I hit my goal (3:30), so this is not sour grapes. I lost 2 minutes in the first 2-3 miles. After that, I could run my pace, but was frequently running around people, taking turns very wide (or slowing a lot taking them on the inside) or waiting behind a slower runner hoping for a break in the pack. I lined up correctly, but thousands of runners do not (check the results and compare chip vs. clock time and you'll see 4hr runners who started within a minute or two of the front -- which is 7 min/mile territory). Also the course gets very tight in many places -- near aid stations, on some narrowers streets and in places where the crowd has taken away one of the running lanes. I'd estimate that most mid-pack runners will lose maybe two minutes of chip time in the early going and then will end up running perhaps a quarter mile farther in order to weave around people and take corners wide. I still had a great time. But, for people solely focused on their time, this race is not as fast for midpackers as it is for elites. There was also a stiff headwind the last three miles. | |
|
A Runner from US
(10/15/2002)
"WOW what a race" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 This was my first Chicago. What a race, well organized great course and great weather. I ran a PB and improved my time by 16 minutes. This is a must do marathon and should be an annual event. | |
|
A Runner from San Diego, CA
(10/15/2002)
"Run this race!!!" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 What an awesome event! It was only my third marathon but the best yet and if I could give 6 stars to the crowd support I would. It was 10-12 deep on the sidewalks at some points and felt as much like a parade as a race which really made the miles fly by. Dropped over 10 minutes from my time in SD just 4 months ago. It's fast, it's fun and a race that should be on every runner's 'to do' list. Only drawback is that you will spend some time in gridlock early but with some creative people dodging I was still able to get on pace by the the third mile. | |
|
A Runner from Northern California
(10/15/2002)
"They treated me like a champ" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 I've run two other marathons: 1. San Francisco / July 2002, a pretty but tough course in a city which tolerates a marathon as long as the runners don't make noise, wake the tourists, or block traffic 2. St. Louis / Oct 2001, great for a first timer looking for a friendly and non-intimidating race Chicago (Oct 2002) was #3, my first big-scale race. Terrific in every way, even though I stunk up the course limping to a PW. THE COURSE: Physically it's almost table-top flat, but a fair number of corner-turns, and you can get a fast time here if you're looking for one, and you're in the really-quick category. If you have a strict time goal such as breaking 4:00 or 4:30 and it's going to be a close one, Chicago would be a 'good' but maybe not the best place to try: large numbers of runners and spectators produced a few bottlenecks for the main field. In case anyone's wondering, every inch of the way I felt totally safe, in every part of town. THE SCENERY: Gorgeous start, glorious finish, scenic throughout. THE FANS: Superlatives fail me. For much of the race they were eight-deep on the sidewalk, all cheering just for me. They were great every painful step of the way, telling me I looked great even though I knew I didn't. I doubt I would have finished without them. I'll always remember the hundreds of little spectator kids on the south side, who held their arms out for high-fives, their hands pulled into the sleeves against the chill. I wanted to hug them all, and I thank them for turning out. THE SUPPORT: Perfect. I felt like every 5 minutes somebody was offering something to drink. THE EXPO: Well organized, but Saturday mid-day it was extremely crowded. Fine if you're into crowds, but if you just want to get your chip and go home and rest, get their early or go on Friday. THE FELLOW RUNNERS: The field is crowded, so if you're having trouble keeping pace you're going to get bumped accidentally quite a bit. THE CITY: Chicago is a wonderful place to visit. TONS of stuff to do, and pre-race publicity will make you feel welcome. If I didn't mention something, it was probably great too, but I don't want to go on too long. Attention spectators: wear warm clothes at the start, it can get cold out there in the shadowy canyons of downtown. RECOMMENDATION: Don't run this as your first marathon, because it will spoil others for you. | |
|
A Runner from Worcester, Massachusetts
(10/15/2002)
 "World Record Fun!" (General Comments)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 3 Chicago is a 'must do' on the marathon circut. I love the 7:30 am start time. The course was as flat as advertised. The neighborhoods have wonderful spirit...especially at mile 7...though some neighborhoods are best to run through quickly. Too much public urination! I mean all over the course, not just the startline. I used Chicago as a long run for NYC in 3 weeks, and, I highly recommend this tactic. If not, Chicago IS the road to a PR with the flat course or the road to be on for your first race. I paced a first timer friend and we both had great payback for our efforts. Very easy experience because of the cheerful volunteers. I'd love to come back and kick butt on this course! | |
|
A Runner from Atlanta, GA
(10/14/2002)
"Great Course! Great Town!" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 This was my first marathon and I really enjoyed it. The course was flat and fast and the fans were terrific. My only complaint was that the 2nd half of the course (on the southside) was not as interesting or enthusiastic as the 1st half (on the northside). It would be interesting to run the course in the reverse order so that the crowd is strongest towards the end. If you're a newcomer to marathons and are looking for a well-organized, forgiving race to get your feet wet, then definitely give Chicago strong consideration. | |
|
Lenn Hann from Naperville, IL
(10/14/2002)
"WR for Paula, PR for me!" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 This was my 6th Chicago and 10th marathon overall, and it couldn't have gone much better. A record 36,000 or so ran this year and us mid-packers had slower traffic to deal with throughout the course. Disney-style pace corrals may be needed in the future. The first two water stops had no Gatorade, which should have been handled better. Other than that, the course, organization and weather were perfect. There were a record number of spectators and they were well-managed and supportive. Clif Shot ran the best mile 18 gel station I've ever seen, with tables and signs for the different flavors - brunch on the run. As a special note for me, I ran in a prototype of the long-distance shoe I've been developing and cut over 14 minutes off my time for a new PR of 4:23:04. All in all, a great year! | |
|
A Runner from Chicago suburbs
(10/14/2002)
"2002 - My first marathon - awesome!" (General Comments)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 Chicago was fantastic! The crowds, the organization, the huge amount of energy and enthusiasm made my first marathon experience a great one. All I can say is WOW! | |
|
A Runner from Asheboro, NC
(10/14/2002)
"One of the best I have run" (General Comments)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 The course is flat, the crowd is very energetic, 30,000+ runners are well managed, good supplies, the hotels are close to the start and finish. Nice job. |
Quick Links
Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools
© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC
