Nov 4, 2024
Current Year Results
Results Search
Biggest/Best Boston Qualifier
2024 Results
2023 Results
2022 Results
2021 Results
2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
2016 Results
2015 Results
2014 Results
2013 Results
2012 Results
2011 Results
2010 Results
2009 Results
2008 Results
2007 Results
2006 Results
2005 Results
2004 Results
2003 Results
2002 Results
2001 Results
2000 Results
☰
Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon Runner Comments
Back to Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon Information & Reviews
Course 4.1 
Organization 3.5 
Spectators 3.7
Number of comments: 347 [displaying comments 81 to 91]
|
L. H. from Bay Area, California
(10/23/2009)
"Good challenging course, bad organization" (about: 2009)
4-5 previous marathons
| 2 Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathons
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 4 Although the course is hilly and the streets are uneven (I fell hitting a bump in the road!), I would run the race again for the sake of the course. I like its challenge in that respect. The website for the race has by far been the worst to navigate through. There were constant website crashes, and not to mention that you had to sift through the entire blog to find race details and course info. Also, the chip timing results were not readily available after the race because of technical difficulties. The start should be more organized as well. The pace groups were split up into different times but this also allowed walkers to be mixed within. This was not a good idea to have walkers starting so early in front of the other runners and made the start very difficult. The race should be organized so that walkers are aware to start in the back. | |
|
A. C. from Ohio
(10/23/2009)
"Beautiful scenery, frustrating start" (about: 2009)
6-10 previous marathons
| 1 Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 3 The course was amazing!!! Incredible views of the ocean, and Golden Gate Park was humbling! The start was not very organized in regard to walkers and runners lining up together. I lined up at nine minutes per mile and passed hundreds of walkers ahead of me. : ( It was dangerous and my finish time definitely suffered because of it. Why not a staggered or wave start, or walkers in a separate start? I fully support marathon walkers - I couldn't do it : ) - but in a race of this size with many more people participating in the half, there has got to be a better way. Start them earlier maybe, and then have a wave start for the rest of us? Otherwise, it was simply a beautiful way to spend 26.2 miles once I got out of the pack about mile 3 or 4! Unforgettable! | |
|
A. M. from Colorado
(10/23/2009)
"Logistics were a nightmare" (about: 2009)
6-10 previous marathons
| 1 Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 1 FANS: 3 Overall, the good may have outweighed the bad. This was my eighth marathon, and the worst organized. The inept race organizers make up for their failures in the overall specialness of the event, but I was glad to be done with Nike. Because it's a lot of people's first/only marathon, Nike can get away with throwing a bad show. Positives: -Beautiful course... and an awesome challenge -The finish line with firemen and necklace -The Ghirardelli chocolate stop -Shuttle transported spectators Negatives: -No e-mail for anyone in my group saying we got in (I found out on my credit card statement) -No additional e-mails about the race (including the email for packet pick up) -Nike website was difficult to negotiate. As one friend put it... "It's all about Nike with a little blog about an upcoming marathon." -We finished in five hours and most of the food treats were already gone (I got a banana and a tablespoon of cereal) -The expo was completely limited to about two vendors... and the manicure line is over an hour -The race results took many long days to post -Runner-tracking didn't work, but at least they gave me a refund afterward | |
|
M. R. from South Bay, CA
(10/22/2009)
"Need a better website!!!!" (about: 2009)
11-50 previous marathons
| 1 Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 2 Positives: 1. Beautiful route 2. Fireman in a tux at the finish line with a blue box 3. Well stocked hydration stations Negatives: 1. The worst website!!!!! 2. No other vendors at the expo (bring GU, Shot Bloks, etc.) 3. Too many walkers blocks the streets 4. Leukemia & Lymphoma teams FORGET that there are many runners without support groups 5. Waited in line for more than an hour to get on the return shuttle cold and tired!!!!! 6. Same finisher necklace for both the full and half marathons; why should I run the full then? | |
|
S. S. from CA
(10/22/2009)
"Product-driven, congested, overhyped" (about: 2009)
6-10 previous marathons
| 1 Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 3 I'm glad that Nike is bringing money to cancer research, which is truly a worthy cause. However, the Nike merchandising was crazy-over-the-top. Normally an expo includes well known speakers lecturing on running topics, and I look forward to learning something about training/running/racing. I enjoy previewing new products and race information from other companies. Nike Women's Marathon SF offered none of this. NO outside races were promoted, and no other vendors products were previewed, except Nike and a few sponsors like Luna. The race course was lovely, but runners were elbow to elbow for miles. Very hard to get past walkers who started up front. Too many people in too small an area. Things did break up around mile 17. The lines for the shuttle buses back to Union Square were unreal. They have got to make some improvements to cut down on the two-plus hours of standing in line we had to endure for a bus after a 26.2 run. That was just too painful. My advice to runners interested in running this race: take lots of money if you want to buy lots of Nike, but save enough money to pay for a cab (at least $30.00) from the end of the race back to Union Square. Skip the prepaid bus! | |
|
S. M. from Los Angeles, CA
(10/22/2009)
"Nike Website!" (about: 2009)
1 previous marathon
| 1 Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 The race was great, but the website was the worst. The blog approach DOES NOT work. I spent more time trying to find information than actually running the race! | |
|
M. A. from US
(10/22/2009)
"Tough but challenging with poor organization" (about: 2009)
1 previous marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 3 As many others have mentioned, the course was even hillier than expected, but it offered a great challenge. This was my second marathon and I was able to PR at 4:58. Although there are 20,000 runners, only 4,000 do the full marathon. This can be a little hard to swallow when the halfers are at the finish and you turn off to do your last 10 miles. I see the results are now posted here, but I was distraught to see that my name was not listed. Nike suggested finding the results a different site. I do show up there, but of course all of my friends use Marathon Guide, and they thought I didn't finish. Great, scenic run, a good cause, and a great necklace, but I won't run again. | |
|
D. S. from Massachusetts
(10/21/2009)
"Fun City, Poor Website and Start" (about: 2009)
11-50 previous marathons
| 1 Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 4 The visit to San Francisco was fabulous, and the course was fun and festive. The finish with the firemen (:-)) was the best finish I've experienced (I've done 13). I didn't like trying to maintain a nine-minute pace behind lots of walkers - more dodging than I've ever done. Also, trying to get information from the official website was a lesson in frustration. | |
|
S. M. from Texas
(10/21/2009)
"Great city and views, but not-so-great start/end" (about: 2009)
3 previous marathons
| 1 Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 1 FANS: 2 I loved most of the course - what's not to love about SF? The Lake Merced loop needs to be removed; it was horrible. The finish line was great with the massage tent; however, they don't tell you that you have to buy food at the end. No information is given out at the expo, which really shouldn't be called an "expo." It was just a poor excuse for Nike to promote more of their stuff. The start line was disorganized. The Chocolate Mile is a joke. I would not do this race again, even for another locket. | |
|
B. L. from CANADA
(10/21/2009)
"Exhilarating, emotional = AWESOME" (about: 2009)
1 previous marathon
| 1 Nike 26.2 = Nike Women's Marathon
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 This was my first full marathon, and it completely exceeded any and all expectations! SF is a beautiful city and the whole experience was just amazing! I HIGHLY recommend it to all. Great support, with aid stations, water and "treats" along the way. |
Quick Links
Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools
© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC
